Skip to content

Case studies

Real accounts. Real numbers.

Six brands with six different problems: an eight-month decline, a single-SKU product at $148, a UK launch from zero, a three-SKU catalogue that needed one winner. Here’s what changed, and what the data told us.

Accounts
6
Marketplaces
US · CA · UK
Reporting window
Apr 2025 – Mar 2026

Showing 6 of 6 accounts

  • US home & kitchen brandHome & KitchenUSJul 2025 – present

    From $7.2K to a $20.5K peak month by betting on one product — and having the discipline to stop funding the one that wasn't working.

    Situation
    Scaling
    Starting point
    3 SKUs · ~$7K a month, no advertising

    What the data said

    • One product converted at close to half the ad cost of the other two, so it became the product we led with — it went on to produce 61% of all ad revenue. The third got worse every month, not better, with ad cost climbing from 56% to 95% of its sales, so we stopped funding it and moved 18% of the budget across.
    • December is a holiday peak. Revenue settled at $10,137 a month by March 2026 — still well clear of the $7,179 pre-advertising baseline.

    Monthly revenue

    +186%increase
    Jun 2025 — before ads$7,179
    Dec 2025 — peak month$20,529
    • Peak vs pre-ads month+186%increase
    ACOS, best month
    36%

    Dec 2025, at 21% TACOS

    Products advertised
    2

    From 0 — three tested, two kept

    Ad revenue from the lead SKU
    61%

    One product of three

    Budget redirected
    18%

    Taken off the losing product

  • US men's grooming brandBeauty & Personal CareUSApr 2025 – present

    Added ~$11K a month of genuinely incremental revenue by learning where advertising works — and stopping where it doesn't.

    Situation
    Scaling
    Starting point
    15+ SKUs · ~$20K a month, organic only

    What the data said

    • Brand-name searches converted at 12–24% ad cost. Generic category terms ran at 134–167% — more than a dollar of spend for every dollar of sales — so every generic campaign was paused and 40 focused ones kept.
    • Organic sales did not drop away when the advertising started. That is what makes the added revenue incremental rather than paying twice for demand the brand already had.

    Monthly revenue

    +35.0%increase
    Before ads — 2024 average$20,000
    Q1 2026 average$27,000
    • Monthly revenue+35.0%increase
    • Campaign count−66.1%decrease
    Incremental revenue from ads
    ~$11,000

    A month, from $0

    Ad cost as % of sales
    21%

    From 0% — no ads before Apr 2025

    Active campaigns
    40

    From a 118-campaign test phase

    Record month
    $30,856

    Mar 2026, highest on record

  • US beauty-accessories brandBeauty & Personal CareUSSep 2025 – present

    Doubled monthly revenue in six months and turned $160-to-$8.6K swings into a predictable $10–13K.

    Situation
    Recovering
    Starting point
    3 SKUs · ~$5.5K a month, unpredictable

    What the data said

    • Competitor brand searches were the most efficient traffic in the account at 8–26% ad cost, and feature-specific search terms converted 2–3x better than broad category terms.
    • The same search data exposed a gap in the product line. The variant launched into that gap was profitable within 30 days, not the 6–12 months an unguided launch takes.

    Average monthly revenue

    +109%increase
    Before ads — 2025 average$5,500
    Q1 2026 average$11,500
    • Average monthly revenue+109%increase
    Monthly range
    $9.9K–$13.3K

    From a $160–$8,600 swing

    ACOS
    35%

    Q1 2026 average, at 25% TACOS

    New product to profitability
    30 days

    Launched off the search data

    Best month
    $13,272

    Mar 2026, best non-holiday month

  • US + CA health & wellness brandHealth & WellnessUS + CAJul 2025 – present

    From $2K to $30K a month on a single product — then repeated it in Canada in 90 days.

    Situation
    Expanding
    Starting point
    One SKU at $148 · ~$2K a month

    What the data said

    • Brand-name searches served at 4–5% ad cost, and problem-aware terms beat generic bedding terms decisively — so the budget went to people already looking for a solution, not browsers.
    • Canada opened on the search terms and competitor targets the US had already proven, which is why it reached efficient advertising in 90 days instead of paying to learn the same lessons twice.

    Monthly revenue, US

    +1400%increase
    Jun 2025 — before ads$2,000
    Jan 2026 — best month$30,000
    • Monthly revenue, US+1400%increase
    Ad cost as % of sales, US
    15–20%

    From 34% at launch

    Ad-attributed sales
    ~$15,000

    A month, from $0

    Ad cost as % of sales, Canada
    12–15%

    From 37% in the launch month

    Canada to efficient spend
    90 days

    A new market usually takes 6+ months

  • UK luxury fragrance brandBeauty & Personal Care — luxury fragranceUKDec 2025 – present

    Built an Amazon UK launch from zero: 132 campaigns and a 19.5% ACOS improvement in four months.

    Situation
    Launching
    Starting point
    7 SKUs · new to Amazon UK, no ad history

    What the data said

    • The niche the category was ignoring paid: dedicated oud and luxury hand-wash terms served at 7–19% ad cost, while broad fragrance terms ran at 46–82% and were cut.
    • Pruning 38% of targets let March spend come in 20% below February while ad-attributed sales finished 34.6% above the launch month. TACOS held at roughly 25% throughout.

    Ad-attributed sales

    +34.6%increase
    Dec 2025 — launch month£6,302
    Mar 2026 — best month£8,480
    • Ad-attributed sales+34.6%increase
    • ACOS−19.5%decrease
    • Active targets−37.9%decrease
    ACOS
    34.6%

    From 43.0% in the launch month

    Campaigns built from zero
    132

    45 in month one, 85 active by March

    Active targets
    356

    Pruned from a 573 peak

    Hero SKU growth
    +74%

    While a third of targets were cut

  • UK food & grocery brandFood & GroceryUKSep 2025 – present

    Reversed an eight-month revenue decline in 30 days, then grew monthly revenue 40% above the declining baseline.

    Situation
    Recovering
    Starting point
    28 SKUs · £13.5K a month and falling

    What the data said

    • The decline was a visibility problem, not a product problem: competitors had started advertising while this brand stayed organic-only. Ads went live across all 28 products in month one and revenue stabilised immediately.
    • December doubles on seasonality, so the honest comparison strips it out — even then the account runs 23% above the pre-decline baseline, and one overlooked SKU went from £284 to £1,880 a month.

    Average monthly revenue

    +40.2%increase
    Mar–Aug 2025 — declining£13,524
    Oct 2025–Mar 2026£18,967
    • Average monthly revenue+40.3%increase
    • Hero SKU+561%increase
    Time to stop the decline
    30 days

    After eight months of falling sales

    Products with ad support
    28 of 28

    From 0 of 28

    Ad cost as % of sales
    21%

    From 0% — no ads before Sep 2025

    Hero SKU
    £1,880

    A month, from £284

Methodology

How we report these numbers

No blended agency averages, no cherry-picked weeks, no metrics that cannot be traced back to an account.

Source
Figures come directly from the advertising and business-report data in the client's own Amazon account, compared like-for-like across the periods shown.
Seasonality
Where seasonality distorts a result, we say so.
Names
Client names are withheld unless the brand has approved disclosure.
Caveat
Results vary by category, price point and competition.

Ready to manage profit instead of ROAS?

Send us your Amazon storefront. We’ll come back with the biggest opportunities we can see and what we’d do first.

Start my free audit
  • No commitment
  • 2–3 business day turnaround
  • Insights you can act on with or without us